USPTO serial 85485132
RANDOLPH ARON S
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VENGROFF, MARILYN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RANDOLPH ARON S?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ashlee Froese
Ashlee Froese Gilbert's LLP77 King Street West, Suite 2010Toronto-Dominion Centre, P.O. Box 301Toronto, Ontario, M5K1K2Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Luggage; handbags; clutch bags; shoulder bags; tote bags; attaché cases; satchels; briefcases; billfolds; wallets; business card cases | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Casual clothing, namely, gloves, shirts, shorts, pants, dresses, gowns, skirts, t-shirts, suits, blazers, scarves, and neckwear, all featuring decorative non-functional body armour; Dress clothing, namely, gloves, shirts, pants, dresses, gowns, skirts, suits, blazers, scarves, and neckwear, all featuring decorative non-functional body armour; Business clothing, namely, shirts, pants, dresses, gowns, skirts, suits, blazers, scarves, and neckwear, all featuring decorative non-functional body armour; Jackets featuring decorative non-functional body armour; Belts featuring decorative non-functional body armour; Pocket squares featuring decorative non-functional body armour; Pocket kerchiefs featuring decorative non-functional body armour; Fashion accessories not of precious metal, namely, collars, headwear, head bands, hats, forearm cuffs, boot braces, decorative non-functional knee pads, and gloves, all featuring decorative non-functional body armour; Boots featuring decorative non-functional body armour; Shoes featuring decorative non-functional body armour; Casual clothing, namely, gloves, shirts, shorts, pants, dresses, gowns, skirts, t-shirts, suits, blazers, scarves, and neckwear; Dress clothing, namely, gloves, shirts, pants, dresses, gowns, skirts, suits, blazers, scarves, and neckwear; Business clothing, namely, shirts, pants, dresses, gowns, skirts, suits, blazers, scarves, and neckwear; Jackets; Belts; Pocket squares; Pocket kerchiefs; Fashion accessories not of precious metal, namely, collars, headwear, head bands, hats, forearm cuffs, boot braces, decorative non-functional knee pads, and gloves; Boots; Shoes | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Online retail store services in the field of clothing, fashion accessories, furniture and housewares; catalog ordering services in the field of clothing, fashion accessories, furniture and housewares; organization of fashion shows for commercial purposes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Randolph Aron Smith
- Other trademarks owned by Randolph Aron Smith
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named RANDOLPH ARON S
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 22, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 22, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 24, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2014 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 22, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2014 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 22, 2014 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 22, 2014 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2014 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2013 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 13, 2013 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 30, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 24, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 2, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 2, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 18, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 18, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2013 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Mar 20, 2013 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 25, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 5, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 7, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 30, 2012 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 14, 2012 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| May 3, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 3, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 16, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 16, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 3, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 22, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |