CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for THE LONDON VAMPS

USPTO serial 85485412

THE LONDON VAMPS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
YONTEF, DAVID ERIC
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE LONDON VAMPS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Eric S. Hyman

ERIC S. HYMAN BLAKELY, SOKOLOFF, TAYLOR & ZAFMAN LLP12400 WILSHIRE BLVD FL 7LOS ANGELES, CA 90025-1019UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment services, namely, live performances by a musical bandACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 29, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 29, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 5, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Apr 4, 2014EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 31, 2014EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 31, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 11, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Dec 10, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 7, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 24, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 24, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 28, 2013NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 2, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 13, 2013NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 22, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 19, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 13, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 12, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 12, 2013ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Sep 26, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 25, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 24, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 24, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 20, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 13, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 15, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 7, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 5, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance