USPTO serial 85486044
FREEMOTION EPIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PARKER, JUSTINE D
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FREEMOTION EPIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard Chang
1500 S 1000 WLOGAN, UT 84321-8206UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Physical fitness equipment, namely, Chest machines, leg extension machines, lat/high row machines, leg curl machines, leg press machines, fly/rear delt machines, hip abduction/adduction machines, shoulder machines, bicep curl machines, tricep machines, assisted dip chin machines, calf extension machines, prone leg curl machines, back extension machines, lateral raise machines, seated row machines, rotary torso machines, abdominal machines, glute machines, plate-loaded machines, plate-loaded leg press, military press machines, weight lifting benches, weight racks, 45 degree back extension machine | ABANDONED | Jun 9, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 2012 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Mar 15, 2012 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 7, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 25, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 9, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |