Drawing for STRUCTURED FLEXIBILITY

USPTO serial 85486162

STRUCTURED FLEXIBILITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KELLY, AMY C
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STRUCTURED FLEXIBILITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

J. Damon Ashcraft

J. DAMON ASHCRAFT SNELL & WILMER LLP400 E VAN BUREN ST # 10PHOENIX, AZ 85004-2223UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Educational services, namely, developing curriculum for others in a variety of subjects at the middle school and high school level and providing courses of instruction at the middle school and high school levelACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 8, 2013MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 27, 2013ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 27, 2013EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 6, 2013EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
May 20, 2013RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
May 20, 2013CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
May 8, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 8, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 30, 2013ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Apr 30, 2013EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 30, 2013JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 30, 2013EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 31, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 26, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 2, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 2, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 27, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 17, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 7, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 16, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 15, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 8, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 6, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance