Drawing for SHELF DIRECT

USPTO serial 85486303

SHELF DIRECT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WILSON, MARYNELLE WEST
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SHELF DIRECT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Antonio Papageorgiou

ANTONIO PAPAGEORGIOU MEISTER SEELIG & FEIN LLP125 PARK AVE FL 7NEW YORK, NY 10017-5627UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Investment banking services; brokerage of shares of stocks and other securities; financial investment in the field of securities; financial services, namely, assisting others with the completion of financial transactions for stocks, bonds, securities and equities; consulting services in the field of corporate finance; consulting services in the field of business mergers and acquisitions; Conducting a securities exchange and related stock market services, namely, providing financial and securities information, compiling and disseminating trade quote, order, execution, index value and other related stock market information; providing on-line financial and securities information services via a global computer network; electronic processing of orders for the purchase and sale of securities; Conducting an online stock exchange for the benefit of the trading of stocks and other financial securitiesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 10, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 10, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 27, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 24, 2016EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 2, 2016EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 2, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 15, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 14, 2016EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 8, 2016EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 8, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 9, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 8, 2015EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 8, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 16, 2015EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 16, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 24, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 9, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 7, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 7, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 7, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 9, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 14, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 14, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 24, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 6, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 3, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 22, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 22, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 22, 2014ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Aug 20, 2014ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Aug 8, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 29, 2014DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Jul 29, 2014GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 29, 2014GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 29, 2014CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 8, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 8, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 8, 2014ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
May 21, 2014ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 7, 2014RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 7, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 7, 2013RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 4, 2013WOAGWITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED—
Oct 4, 2013WOARTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED—
May 2, 2013RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 29, 2012GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 29, 2012GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 29, 2012CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 2, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 2, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 26, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 17, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 16, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 16, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 16, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 8, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 6, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance