USPTO serial 85487010
PROHANDLER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PROHANDLER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James T. Nikolai
James T. Nikolai NIKOLAI & MERSEREAU, P.A.900 2ND AVE S STE 1550MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-3325UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Earth-moving machines; agricultural equipment in the nature of attachments for earth-moving machines, namely, road sweepers, tree stump cutters, pallet fork lifters, bale spikes, grapples, trench cutters, backhoes, plow blades, and earth-moving machine-towed agricultural implements in the nature of mowers, buckets, earth augers, and hammers in the nature of hydraulic hammers and jack hammers for breaking up rock, pavement and concrete; skid-steer loaders; and attachments for skid-steer loaders, namely, road sweepers, tree stump cutters, pallet fork lifters, bale spikes, grapples, trench cutters, backhoes, plow blades and skid-steer loader agricultural implements in the nature of mowers, buckets, earth augers, and hammers in the nature of hydraulic hammers, and jack hammers for breaking up rock, pavement and concrete; attachments to land vehicles, namely, road sweepers, tree stump cutters, agricultural instruments in the nature of bale spikes, grapples, trench cutters, backhoes, plow blades for vehicles, and tractor-towed agricultural implements in the nature of mowers, tractor-towed agricultural instruments in the nature of buckets, earth augers, and hammers in the nature of hydraulic hammers and jack hammers for breaking up rock, pavement and concrete; attachments for utility terrain vehicles, namely, road sweepers, tree stump cutters, agricultural instruments in the nature of bale spikes, grapples, trench cutters, backhoes, plow blades for utility terrain vehicles, and utility terrain vehicle-towed agricultural implements in the nature of mowers, utility terrain vehicle-towed agricultural instruments in the nature of buckets, earth augers, and hammers in the nature of buckets, earth augers, and hammers in the nature of hydraulic hammers and jack hammers for breaking up rock, pavement and concrete | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Land vehicles and structural parts thereof; attachments to land vehicles, namely, pallet fork lifters in the nature of fork lift trucks; utility terrain vehicles; and attachments for utility terrain vehicles, namely, pallet fork lifters in the nature of pallet fort lift utility terrain vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 15, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 12, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2016 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 31, 2015 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 14, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2015 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 8, 2015 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 16, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2015 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 8, 2015 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 8, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2014 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 5, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 9, 2014 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 8, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2014 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 6, 2014 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 25, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2013 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 14, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 24, 2013 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 11, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 9, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 8, 2013 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 21, 2013 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 8, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 7, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 17, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 3, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 22, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |