USPTO serial 85487216
TSCH!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GUTTADAURO, JULIE MARIE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TSCH!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence J. Shurupoff
LAWRENCE J SHURUPOFF2381 NW EXECUTIVE CENTER DRBOCA RATON, FL 33431 8560UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Pet training device, namely, a device that emits a sound through compressed gas in order to control a pet's behavior | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2012 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 19, 2012 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 19, 2012 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 19, 2012 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 26, 2012 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 24, 2012 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 27, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 7, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 23, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 21, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 3, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 3, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 19, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 9, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |