Drawing for INTERCOAT

USPTO serial 85488102

INTERCOAT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CORWIN, CHARLOTTE K
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INTERCOAT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert T.S. Latta

ROBERT T.S. LATTA HAHN LOESER & PARKS LLP65 E STATE ST STE 1400COLUMBUS, OH 43215-4209UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
002coatings for metal components to improve corrosion resistance; coatings for zinc or zinc-alloy coated metal components to improve corrosion resistanceACTIVE—
006metal components having a corrosion-resistant coating, namely metal sheet; zinc or zinc-alloy coated metal components having a corrosion-resistant coating, namely metal sheetACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 4, 2012MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Dec 4, 2012ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Dec 3, 2012EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Nov 5, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 5, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 5, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 19, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 18, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 18, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 19, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 19, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 19, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 13, 2011MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Dec 12, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 9, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance