Drawing for ECOSMART BY LENNAR BUILT GREEN · SAVE GREEN · SMART MOVE

USPTO serial 85488444

ECOSMART BY LENNAR BUILT GREEN · SAVE GREEN · SMART MOVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CORWIN, CHARLOTTE K
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ECOSMART BY LENNAR BUILT GREEN · SAVE GREEN · SMART MOVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036real estate management and real estate brokerage services of energy efficient residential communities, undeveloped properties and individual residencesACTIVE—
037real estate development and planning services, namely, developing, laying out and constructing energy efficient residential communities and energy efficient individual residencesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 29, 2013MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 24, 2013ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 24, 2013EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 9, 2013EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jul 9, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 17, 2013GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 17, 2013GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 17, 2013CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
May 9, 2013EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 9, 2013JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 7, 2013EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 6, 2013ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Nov 5, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 5, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 5, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 17, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 17, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 17, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 20, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 20, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 20, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 13, 2011MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Dec 12, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 9, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance