USPTO serial 85489069
BRAIN SOUND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4468551Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 21, 2014
- Examiner
- LIWINSKI, HELENE AGNES
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BRAIN SOUND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
INNOCHIPS TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.
Ansan-Si, Gyeonggi-Do, KR
INNOCHIPS TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.
Ansan-Si, Gyeonggi-Do, KR
INNOCHIPS TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.
Ansan-Si, Gyeonggi-Do, KR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Hosoon Lee
Hosoon Lee Renaissance IP Law Group LLP17933 NW Evergreen Place, Suite 121Beaverton, OR 97006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Room fragrances; Balm for home, namely, room fragrances; Fragrances for automobiles; Balm for office, namely, room fragrances; Balm for desk, namely, room fragrances for office use; fragrances for personal use, Natural perfume | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 005 | Air purifying preparations; Air freshening preparations | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | Electronic equipment, namely, electronic sound mixing, processing and synthesizing apparatus; Musical sound recordings; Sound reproduction apparatus | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 011 | Air filters for domestic use; Air purifying apparatus and machines; Air sterilizers; Air filtering installations; Electric room deodorizing units | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by INNOCHIPS TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by INNOCHIPS TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by INNOCHIPS TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named BRAIN SOUND
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2, 2024 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 21, 2023 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2020 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2020 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 13, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 21, 2020 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2019 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 17, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2014 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 5, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 16, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 27, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 27, 2013 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 25, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 7, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 30, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 20, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 13, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 10, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |