USPTO serial 85489702
MAMA MELLACE'S
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLANDU, FLORENTINA
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MAMA MELLACE'S?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nicole K. McLaughlin
NICOLE K. MCLAUGHLIN DUANE MORRIS LLP30 S 17TH ST FL 5PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-4196UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Processed edible nuts; candied nuts; chocolate covered nuts; processed edible seeds; dried fruits; dried fruit mixes; dried fruit and nut mixes; nut-based snack mixes; snack mixes consisting primarily of processed fruits, seeds, and/or nuts; trail mixes consisting primarily of processed fruits, seeds and/or nuts; fruit chips; preserved fruits; sugared fruits; dried prunes, dates, raisins and coconut; glazed fruits; glazed cherries; soup mixes; spreads, namely, nut spread, fruit based spread, hummus spread; dips; snack foods, namely, potato chips; baking goods, namely, fruit fillings for cakes and pies; unflavored gelatins; dried lentils; pulses; peanut butter and other nut butters; soy based products and beverages, namely, soy nuts, soy based chips, soy based snack foods; fruit based snack food | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Snack mixes consisting primarily of crackers, pretzels, sesame sticks, chips, and/or popped corn; confectionery, namely, candy and chocolate; spices and seasonings; cocoa spread; salsas; snack foods, namely, puffed corn snacks, sesame sticks, crackers, wafers, cheese puffs, corn based snacks, pretzels, cookies, biscuits, tortilla chips and corn chips; croutons; baking goods, namely, cake mixes, muffin mixes, brownie mixes, pastry mixes, chocolate chips and peanut butter chips, candy mints, baking crumbs, baking powder, baking soda, crust mixes for making pie crusts, fruit jelly powders, graham crumbs, corn starch, vanilla extract; syrups, namely, table syrup, pancake syrup; artificial and natural extracts used as flavoring; flavored gelatins; yeast; cocoa powder; sugar and sugar substitutes; popcorn of various flavors; marshmallows; microwave popcorn; seasonings for popcorn; flours; grains, namely, processed grains for eating; cereals, namely, breakfast cereals; rolled oats and oatmeal; wheat germ; rice; peanut brittle; honey; cereal based snack food; wheat based snack food; rice based snack food; rice cakes; processed cereals; ready to eat cereal-based bars; granola, namely, granola based bars and granola cereals | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | Unprocessed edible nuts; unprocessed edible seeds; snack mixes consisting primarily of unprocessed seeds and/or nuts; un-popped popcorn of various flavours; grains, namely, unprocessed grains for eating; fresh lentils; unprocessed cereals | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 19, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 18, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 7, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 16, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 10, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 26, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 15, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 15, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 7, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 6, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 23, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 19, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 16, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 10, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 10, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 22, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 2, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 2, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 21, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 24, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 13, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 10, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |