Drawing for INDICO

USPTO serial 85491587

INDICO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KOLACZ, KATHLEEN L
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INDICO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John W. Gregory

JOHN W. GREGORY Beacon Law Advisors, PLLC801 2nd Ave. Suite 614SEATTLE, WA 98104UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer Software for application performance management toolsACTIVEMar 24, 2011

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 21, 2012MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Aug 21, 2012ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Aug 20, 2012EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Apr 18, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 18, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 18, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 26, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 26, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 26, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 26, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 24, 2012GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 24, 2012GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 24, 2012CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 23, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 20, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 13, 2012PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Dec 19, 2011TAEATEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED—
Dec 19, 2011PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Dec 15, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 13, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance