USPTO serial 85491946
MY FRIEND HUGGLES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LORENZO, KATHLEEN H
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MY FRIEND HUGGLES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
The Great Divide Clothing Company Inc.
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Other trademarks owned by The Great Divide Clothing Company Inc.
MONT-ROYAL, QUEBEC, CA
MONT-ROYAL, QUEBEC, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Howard R. Fine
HOWARD R. FINE HOWARD R. FINE, ATTORNEY AT LAW2100 SANDERS RD STE 200NORTHBROOK, IL 60062-6141UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Children's books; Greeting cards, all of the foregoing being associated with or related to a line of dolls for children | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by The Great Divide Clothing Company Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by GREAT DIVIDE CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by GREAT DIVIDE CORP.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named MY FRIEND HUGGLES
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 16, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 1, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2015 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 28, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 15, 2015 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 15, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2015 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 2, 2015 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 22, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2014 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 17, 2014 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2014 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 16, 2014 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 16, 2014 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 16, 2014 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 9, 2014 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2014 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2014 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2014 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2014 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 22, 2014 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 7, 2014 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2014 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2014 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 16, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2013 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 15, 2013 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 7, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2013 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2013 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 25, 2013 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2013 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 17, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 16, 2013 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2013 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 12, 2013 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2013 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 25, 2013 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2012 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 11, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 21, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 4, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 31, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 31, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 9, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 21, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |