Drawing for TUGGER

USPTO serial 85492070

TUGGER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HETZEL, DANNEAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TUGGER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Purvi J. Patel

Purvi J. Patel Haynes and Boone, LLP2323 Victory AvenueSuite 700Dallas, TX 75219

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer game programs; computer game software; electronic game programs; electronic game software; interactive video game programs; downloadable electronic game programs and computer software platforms for social networking that may be accessed via the Internet, computers and wireless devices; downloadable electronic games via the Internet and wireless devices; digital media, namely, pre-recorded DVDs, downloadable audio and video recordings, and CDs featuring and promoting travel and petsACTIVE
016Books featuring works of fiction and non-fiction; calendars; children's activity books; wrapping paper; gift bags; greeting cards; paper party decorations; newsletters featuring stories, games, comedy, drama, action, and adventure; stationeryACTIVE
041Educational and entertainment services, namely, a continuing program about travel and pets accessible by radio, television, satellite, audio, video and computer networks; production of television shows and DVDs featuring comedy, drama, action, and adventureACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 4, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 4, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 30, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jan 29, 2014EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Dec 30, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Dec 30, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 20, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jun 18, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jun 18, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jun 18, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 1, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 6, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Nov 6, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 17, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Oct 3, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Oct 3, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Sep 20, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 20, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 19, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 19, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 2, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 2, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Mar 26, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 26, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 26, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 20, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 17, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 17, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Dec 17, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Dec 13, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance