USPTO serial 85492534
BEE KIND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMIGA, HOWARD
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BEE KIND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Paradise Valley, AZ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Deborah Henscheid
DEBORAH HENSCHEID INGRASSIA FISHER & LORENZ PC7010 E COCHISE RDSCOTTSDALE, AZ 85253-1406UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Paper, cardboard and goods made from these materials, namely, stationery items, namely, writing paper, printing paper, notepads, adhesive note paper, and envelopes; greeting cards; stickers; table napkins of paper; cardboard packaging; paper bags for packaging; paper ribbon; paper tags; paper labels; posters; plastic bags for packaging | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 12, 2014 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 12, 2014 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 12, 2014 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 25, 2014 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jul 15, 2014 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Jun 3, 2014 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2014 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2014 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 10, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 7, 2014 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2014 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2014 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 7, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2014 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 4, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 4, 2014 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 5, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 5, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 15, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 17, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 27, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 9, 2012 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 8, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 23, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 27, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2012 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2012 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 22, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 21, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 20, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |