Drawing for HYDROBLAST

USPTO serial 85493078

HYDROBLAST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4224598Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 16, 2012
Examiner
THOMAS, JULIE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HYDROBLAST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jordana S. Rubel

Jordana S. Rubel Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP1111 Pennsylvania Avenue, NWWashington, DC 20004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007A power operated tool used in a wellbore for providing periodic water hammer pressure pulses that enhance the delivery of well stimulation fluids, enhance wellbore cleaning and enhance the transport of debris out of the wellboreSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDSep 9, 2011

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 12, 2014C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Feb 5, 2014C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED—
Feb 5, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 16, 2014ES7STEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED—
Mar 18, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 18, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 16, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 31, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 31, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 11, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 26, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 20, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 19, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 19, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 12, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 31, 2012ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 22, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 22, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 22, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 12, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 11, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 11, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 26, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 26, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 26, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 21, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 20, 2011MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Dec 19, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 15, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance