USPTO serial 85493242
WHY CLIMB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RICHARDS, LESLIE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WHY CLIMB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jason S. Howell
JASON S HOWELL PERKINS COIE LLP1201 THIRD AVENUESUITE 4900SEATTLE, WA 98101Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Shears; tools, namely, hand operated sprayer for paint; tools, namely, vacuum cleaner hose attachments; tools, namely, cleaning pads; hand tools for reaching objects, namely, fixed and extension poles; tools, namely, hooks for pulling down limbs from tree branches; hand tools, namely, caulking gun holder; hand tools, namely, manually operated tool for picking up garbage and debris; hand tools, namely, shovels; hand tools, namely, drywall and plaster hawks; hand tools, namely, manually operated tool for remotely using paint brushes, pads, shields, and rollers affixed to a pole; hand tools, namely, manually operated tool for installing and de-installing light bulbs; hand tools, namely, pliers, magnetic grip pliers, needle nose pliers, and vise grip pliers; hand tools, namely, hand operated saws and hand operated adjustable limb saw; hand tools, namely, hand operated sprayer for paint; hand tools, namely, manually operated reaching tools for holding boom microphones, reflective lighting panel holders, cameras, and film lighting; hand tools, namely, cushioned tongs; extension poles for hand tools; manually-operated extension poles with a manually-operated handle for remotely operating or actuating a device attached on a pole distal end for hand tools; hand operated saws for lawn and garden use; hand tools, namely, pruners; saws for cutting branches; loppers; manually operated reaching tools for changing light bulbs, window washing, cleaning gutters, holding spray cans, dusting, and holding water spray guns; hand tools, namely, hand-operated sprayer for use operating an aerosol spray can; tool belt; hand tools, namely, pliers specially adapted for hanging lights; hand tools, namely, tongs; vise grip; metal vises; hand tools, namely, scrapers; blades; tool bags and cases sold empty especially adapted for holding or carrying hand tools; sheaths; pickers, namely, hand tools, in the nature of manually operated tool for picking fruit; hand tools, namely, hand-operated sanders; reachers, namely, hand tools for reaching objects in the nature of fixed and extension poles; hand operated nozzles; dusters; dusters for ceiling fans; dusters for plants and foliage; brushes, namely, cleaning brushes for cleaning cobwebs and other household uses; brushes, namely, scrub brushes for household use; tools, namely, mops; tools, namely, planters for domestic gardening; hand tools, namely, Hand operated, non-electric pool cleaning pump in a stick-like shape which a user can manipulate to collect debris from a spa or pool through a simple pumping action that creates suction; tools, namely, scoops for the disposal of pet waste; squeegees for household use; bottles, namely, water bottles sold empty | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12, 2013 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 8, 2013 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 8, 2013 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 24, 2013 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jul 2, 2013 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2013 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2013 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 29, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2013 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 23, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 23, 2013 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 23, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 23, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 25, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 24, 2012 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 24, 2012 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 24, 2012 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 23, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 23, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 20, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 20, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2011 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Dec 19, 2011 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |