USPTO serial 85494184
ITW. IN THE WORD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROBERTSON, DEIRDRE G
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ITW. IN THE WORD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
St. Charles, IL
St. Charles, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mary Vidal Hays
MARY VIDAL HAYS ARONBERG GOLDGEHN DAVIS & GARMUSA330 N WABASH AVE STE 1700CHICAGO, IL 60611-7765UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Hangers in the nature of metal hooks used to hang a purse or bag from a table; metal key chains | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Magnets; mouse pads; smart phone cases; tablet computer cases | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | Necklaces; key chains of precious metal | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Folders; bookmarks; stationery; printed invitations; note cards; calendars; stickers; binders; bumper stickers; coasters of paper | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | Purses; tote bags; umbrellas; leather key chains | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Mugs; travel mugs; coasters not of paper and not being table linen; coasters of textile | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by In the Word, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by In the Word, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named ITW. IN THE WORD
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 10, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 3, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2014 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 29, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 9, 2014 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 10, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 8, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 9, 2013 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 12, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 23, 2013 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 9, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 9, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 19, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 18, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 18, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 18, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 18, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 22, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 20, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |