USPTO serial 85494426
GOOD MONEY. GREAT SCHOOLS.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MULLEN, MARK
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GOOD MONEY. GREAT SCHOOLS.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Highland Park, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert Gorman
ROBERT GORMAN LEVUN, GOODMAN & COHEN, LLP500 SKOKIE BLVD STE 650NORTHBROOK, IL 60062-2814UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Matching students with scholarships at colleges and/or universities which they qualify for | ACTIVE | Jul 3, 2008 |
| 036 | A service providing information on scholarships available at colleges and/or universities; a service to assist students in applying for scholarships at colleges or universities | ACTIVE | Jul 3, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 2013 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Apr 16, 2013 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 3, 2013 | TPDD | TEAS DUE DILIGENCE PETITION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 17, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 17, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |