Drawing for JAMCAM

USPTO serial 85495380

JAMCAM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KOLACZ, KATHLEEN L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JAMCAM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joseph J. Weissman

Joseph J. Weissman JOHNSON POPE BOKOR RUPPEL & BURNS LLP403 E MADISON ST STE 400TAMPA, FL 33602-4614UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Instant Messaging services; audio and video broadcasting services over the internet; providing e-mail services; video teleconferencing; video-on-demand transmission services; web-conferencing services; computer services, namely, providing transmission of messages among computer users to organize and conduct online meetings, gatherings, and interactive discussionsACTIVE—
042Computer services in the nature of customized web pages featuring user-defined information, creative content, personal profiles, file-sharing, and information and computer services, namely, hosting on-line web facilities for others for organizing and conducting online meetings, gatherings, and interactive discussionsACTIVE—
045Internet based social networking, introduction, and dating servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 16, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 15, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 15, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 14, 2015EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jul 1, 2015EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jul 1, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 28, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 27, 2015EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 12, 2015EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 12, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 7, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 6, 2014EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 6, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 11, 2014EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 11, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 15, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 17, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 15, 2014EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 15, 2014EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 15, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 20, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 17, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 15, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 15, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 15, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 15, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 15, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 20, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 20, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 31, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 12, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 12, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 29, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 13, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 13, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 13, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 13, 2012GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 13, 2012GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 13, 2012CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Feb 24, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 22, 2011MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Dec 21, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 17, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance