Drawing for KIDS "R" US

USPTO serial 85496591

KIDS "R" US

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BORSUK, ESTHER
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KIDS "R" US?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Timothy D. Pecsenye

Timothy D. Pecsenye Blank Rome LLPOne Logan Square8th FloorPhiladelphia, PA 19103-6998

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Non-medicated toiletries; toothpaste; body wash, shampoo, hair detangling preparations, lip balm, cosmetic sunscreen preparations, all of the foregoing for infants, babies, toddlers and children; baby and toddler wipesACTIVE—
005First-aid kits; adhesive bandages; infant food; baby foodACTIVE—
011LampsACTIVE—
016Disposable paper seat covers for toilets and potties; disposable training pantsACTIVE—
032Fruit and vegetable juices for infants, babies, toddlers and childrenACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 14, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 14, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 20, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 19, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 11, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 11, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 15, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 15, 2013NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Mar 14, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 14, 2013DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 12, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 11, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 11, 2013DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Mar 11, 2013ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Mar 11, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 19, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 19, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 11, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 17, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 17, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 27, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 13, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 13, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 24, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 24, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 24, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 24, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 24, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 23, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 23, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 23, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 23, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 22, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 21, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 21, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 1, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 30, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 24, 2011MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Dec 23, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 19, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance