USPTO serial 85497559
IDATAHUB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 18, 2013
- Examiner
- BAKER, JORDAN A
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with IDATAHUB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin Oliveira
Kevin Oliveira Odin, Feldman & Pittleman PC1775 Wiehle Avenue, Suite 400Reston, VA 20190-5159UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software that provides real-time, integrated business management intelligence by combining information from various databases and presenting it in an easy-to-understand user interface; computer software for providing an on-line database in the field of transaction processing to provide statistical analysis, and produce notifications and reports; computer software to automate data warehousing and data processing; and associated documentation sold together as a unit with the aforementioned goods, namely, computer manuals, users' guidelines for computer hardware and software, programmers' references, computer system requirement specifications, computer product specifications, training manuals, computer troubleshooting manuals and documentation | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2012 |
| 042 | Computer service, namely, acting as an application service provider to host computer application software for providing an on-line database in the field of transaction processing to provide statistical analysis, and produce notifications and reports; Computer service, namely, acting as an application service provider to host computer application software to automate data warehousing and data processing; Data automation and collection service using proprietary software to evaluate, analyze and collect information and data and facilitate decision processing; Computer consulting services for planning, design and analysis of computer-based information processes and computer hardware systems and computer software systems; analysis and design of computer systems for others; analysis and design of business-based computer information systems for others; design for others of software applications; providing design, development, and maintenance for others' computer networks; Consulting services in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; hosting computer software systems and software applications for the networks of others; information technology consultation services; consultation on the computer-related aspects of information technology and information technology security; providing temporary use of a web-based software application that provides real-time, integrated business management intelligence by combining information from various databases and presenting it in an easy-to-understand user interface; providing online non-downloadable software for operating an on-line database in the field of transaction processing to provide statistical analysis, and produce notifications and reports; providing online non-downloadable software to automate data warehousing and data processing | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2012 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 12, 2023 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2023 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Dec 12, 2023 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Dec 12, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 16, 2023 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2022 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2019 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2019 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jun 25, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 17, 2019 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2013 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 16, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 15, 2013 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2013 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 14, 2013 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 14, 2013 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| May 14, 2013 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 8, 2013 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 1, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 18, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 18, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 16, 2013 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2013 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2013 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2013 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 10, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 26, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 29, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |