USPTO serial 85499089
CHUMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HALMEN, KATHERINE E
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CHUMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David A. Bell
DAVID A BELL HAYNES AND BOONE LLP2323 VICTORY AVE STE 700DALLAS, TX 75219-7673UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail store services and retail store services via the Internet featuring clothing; arranging and conducting incentive reward programs to promote games, gaming, virtual communities, and social networking services by allowing participants to earn virtual and real world gifts; arranging and conducting incentive reward programs for users through issuance and processing of loyalty points to promote the offering of games, gaming, virtual communities, and social networking services; providing advertising space in social networking sites via a global computer network; providing advertising space in the on-screen display of application software for use in portable electronic devices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Fungami, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by PEOPLEFUN LLC
- Other trademarks owned by PEOPLEFUN LLC
- Other trademarks owned by PEOPLEFUN, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named CHUMS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 8, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 8, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 4, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2014 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2014 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 3, 2014 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 3, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 5, 2014 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 5, 2014 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2014 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 5, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 25, 2013 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Sep 24, 2013 | RGTR | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - TTAB REQUEST | — |
| Sep 16, 2013 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 15, 2013 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 15, 2013 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 15, 2013 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 21, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 11, 2012 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 22, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 7, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 20, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 6, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 5, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 26, 2012 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 26, 2012 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 26, 2012 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 26, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 3, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |