USPTO serial 85499316
FLOCK FREE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 9, 2016
- Examiner
- SPRUILL, DARRYL M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FLOCK FREE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
JACKSON, NJ
JACKSON, NJ
JACKSON, NJ
JACKSON, NJ
JACKSON, NJ
JACKSON, NJ
BAYVILLE, NJ
BAYVILLE, NJ
BAYVILLE, NJ
BAYVILLE, NJ
BAYVILLE, NJ
BAYVILLE, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RENE-MARTIN OLIVERAS
18 BROOKLAKE RDFLORHAM PARK, NJ 07932-2817UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Installation, maintenance and repair of HAZE/MIST GENERATING SYSTEMS; Installation, maintenance, and repair of outdoor automated mist systems for insect and pest control | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 29, 2015 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by KAPS, THERESA
- Other trademarks owned by KAPS, THERESA
- Other trademarks owned by KAPS, THERESA
- Other trademarks owned by KAPS, THOMAS
- Other trademarks owned by KAPS, THOMAS
- Other trademarks owned by KAPS, THOMAS
- Other trademarks owned by ROSARIO, JEANNE
- Other trademarks owned by ROSARIO, JEANNE
- Other trademarks owned by ROSARIO, JEANNE
- Other trademarks owned by ROSARIO, PAUL
- Other trademarks owned by ROSARIO, PAUL
- Other trademarks owned by ROSARIO, PAUL
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named FLOCK FREE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2023 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 9, 2021 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 6, 2016 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2016 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 8, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2016 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 7, 2016 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 28, 2016 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2016 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 27, 2016 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 27, 2016 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 27, 2016 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 27, 2016 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 28, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 28, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 22, 2016 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2015 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 19, 2015 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2015 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 19, 2015 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 19, 2015 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 21, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 20, 2015 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2015 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2015 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 25, 2015 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 25, 2015 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 25, 2015 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 23, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 20, 2015 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2014 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 15, 2014 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Sep 15, 2014 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 15, 2014 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2014 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2014 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 7, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2014 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 7, 2014 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 7, 2014 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2014 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 25, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 5, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 15, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 15, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 16, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 6, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 19, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 20, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 3, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |