USPTO serial 85499389
RASRAJ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 11, 2013
- Examiner
- PEREZ, STEVEN M
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with RASRAJ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Victor Wu
Victor Wu Law Offices of Victor WuPO Box 3188Ontario, CA 91761Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Nut Based Snack Foods; Fruit Based Snack Foods; Dried Fruit Based Snacks; Fruit Chip; Faradi Chevada in the nature of trail mixes consisting primarily of fried lentils, processed peanuts, toasted corn and also including rice flakes and corn flakes; chevada trail mix consisting primarily of fried lentils and processed peanuts; Chanadal in the nature of trail mix comprising split processed lentils; Mutter (fried green peas); Dalmooth in the nature of trail mix consisting primarily of processed split lentils and also including yellow noodles; Masal Peanuts (spicy peanut snacks); Masala Kaju (spicy cashew nuts); bundi in the nature of trail mix consisting primarily of processed lentils; hot mix in the nature of spicy trail mix consisting primarily of process lentils; channa dal in the nature of trail snack mix consisting primarily of processed split lentils; chevdo in the nature of trail snack mix consisting primarily of processed split peas, processed cashews and peanuts, raisins, potato sticks and also including rice flakes, corn flakes and spices | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Cereal Based Snack Foods; Grain Based Snack Foods; Multigrain Based Snack Foods; Corn Based Snack Foods; Khari biscuits in the nature of salted pastry; Papadi gathiya (fried noodle snacks); Tikha Gathiya, (spicy fried noodle snacks); Bhavanagari Tathiya (fried noodle snacks); Masala Papadi (mixed spicy noodle snacks); Fafda Gathiya (long noodles); Sev Thin (yellow thin noodles); Sev Thick (yellow thick noodles); Chorafali in the nature of cookies made of lentils, flour, and spices; Sakkarpora in the nature of sweet flour cookies; Chakri in the nature of round cookies made from flour, rice, and spices; Farsee Puri (spicy cookies); Masal Puri (spicy cookies); Namkpara (salted wheat flourbased snack); Bhel mix (rice puff and noodle snack mixture); Moong Dal (special yellow noodles); Pani Puri (puff pastry); Papadi Puri (flat puff pastry); Khakhra Masala (dry spicy thin biscuits); Khakhra Methi (dry bitter biscuits); Nadiadi mix in the nature of fried noodle and grain-based snack trail mix also including processed nuts; Ice Cream Desserts; Bakery Desserts; Pastry, Bread; Cookies; Pies; Cakes; Tarts; Flan; Snack Cakes; wheat and rice flour Based Chip; Grain Based Chip; Ice Cream; Cereal based snack foods; grain based snack foods; multigrain based snack foods; corn based snack foods; corn chevada, namely, an Indian snack food made primarily from corn; Khari biscuits, namely, puff biscuits; Indian confectionary, namely, Barfi (sweet milk powder cake), Ladoo in the nature of fried sweets made from ground flour and sugar, Mohanthal (a gram flour fudge with butter and sugar), Halwa (sweet wheat meal), Messur (gram sugar candy), Kaju Katri (cashew nut candy), Jalebi (plain flour sugar candy), Cham Cham (Indian cottage cheese rolled candy), Rasgolla (Indian cottage cheese sugar candy), Jamun (candy made from milk powder and sugar), Adadiya (Candy made from lentil flour and sugar), Anarkali (candy made from Indian cottage cheese and sugar), Sandesh (candy made with Indian cottage cheese and sugar), Rimsim (cashew nut flavor candy), Melonia (watermelon flavored candy), Raj Bhog (candy), Ras Malai (milk pudding), Petha (pumpkin flavored candy), Kala Kand (Indian Cottage Cheese candy), Mawa Cake (cheese cake), Shrikhand (yogurt pudding), Patisa (flat candy made with gram flour and sugar), Koprapak (coconut candy), Kaju Roll (rolled candy made with cashew nut), Ghughra (stuffed candy consists of cheese, cashew nut, butter, sugar, and Semolina flour); prepared candy, snacks, and bakery products, namely, methi khakhara (cracker), burfee (sweet candy), kalakan (sweet candy), halwa (sweet candy), ghari (sweet candy), penda (sweet candy), balushahi (sweet candy), bundi (sweet candy), churma (sweet candy), mohanthal (sweet candy), bhakarwadi (spicy stuffed pastry), bhel mix (rice puff and noodle trail mix), biscuits (cookies), chakri (rice-based chips), kachori (stuffed pastry), fafda (tea biscuit), fulwadi (spiced fried noodle snack), and gathiya (spiced fried noodle snack) | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | [ Wholesale food distributorship services featuring food, Indian food, Indo-China Food, Ethnic Foods, Sweets, Snacks, ice cream, drinks, pastry, desserts, confectionary, and bread; Online wholesale and retail store services featuring snacks, pastry, desserts, sweets, snacks, and bread; ] Retail store services featuring snacks, pastry, desserts, sweets, snacks, and bread | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Restaurant Services; Indian Restaurant Services, Indo-Chinese Restaurant Services; catering services; catering services featuring desserts, drinks, breakfast, lunch, dinner, and brunch | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by RASRAJ EXPRESS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by RASRAJ EXPRESS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by RASRAJ EXPRESS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Rasraj, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named RASRAJ
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2023 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2023 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 7, 2023 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Mar 7, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 7, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 15, 2023 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2022 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2020 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2020 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 5, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 10, 2020 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2020 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Nov 25, 2019 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2019 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Jun 4, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 30, 2019 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 26, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 6, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 14, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 4, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 4, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 4, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 2, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 31, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 22, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 16, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 31, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 18, 2012 | PMSG | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - MAKE SPECIAL - GRANTED | — |
| Jan 12, 2012 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 3, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 29, 2011 | TPMS | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR-MAKE SPECIAL-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |