USPTO serial 85500113
INDIGO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAKHDOOM, SAIMA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INDIGO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ASHLEY G. KESSLER
ASHLEY G. KESSLER COZEN O'CONNORONE BISCAYNE TOWER, 30TH FLOOR2 SOUTH BISCAYNE BOULEVARDMIAMI, FL 33131Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Engines in the nature of mechanical and electrical power generation devices for stationary power generation, namely, internal combustion engines in the nature of spark-ignition engines, compression-ignition engines, and reciprocating engines comprised primarily of direct-injection two and four-stroke engines, gas turbine engines not for land vehicles, steam turbines, gas turbine combined cycle power generators; generators of electricity, namely, Rankine cycle power generators and magnetohydrodynamic power generators; Marine vehicle engines, namely, boat motors, internal combustion engines for boats, internal combustion engines in the nature of spark-ignition, compression-ignition, and reciprocating engines comprised primarily of direct-injection two and four-stroke engines, gas turbines not for land vehicles, steam turbines, gas turbine combined cycle power generators, generators of electricity, namely, Rankine cycle power generators and magnetohydrodynamic power generators, and fluidic thrusters for machinery; Submarine vehicle engines; Air vehicle engines, namely, aircraft gas turbine engines and reciprocating engines; Space vehicle engines, namely, rocket engines, hybrid gas turbine rocket engines, and fluidic thrusters for machinery; Fuel based power generators; Propulsion systems for marine vehicles, submarine vehicles, air vehicles, and space vehicles comprised primarily of turbine engines, fluid inlets fluid compressors, fluid chemical reactors, fluid expanders, fluid transporters, fluid directors, fluid nozzles, propellers, shafts, clutches, fans, bearings, heat exchangers, lubrications systems, seals, valves, control systems, instrumentation, flanges, fasteners, wiring, electrical AC components, and electrical DC components; generators of electricity, namely, Rankine cycle power generators and magnetohydrodynamic power generators for land vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Land vehicle engines, namely, mechanical and electrical power generation devices for stationary power generation, namely, internal combustion engines for land vehicles in the nature of reciprocating engines comprised primarily of spark-ignition, compression-ignition, and direct injection two and four-stroke engines, gas turbines for land vehicles, steam turbines for land vehicles; land vehicle engines; Propulsion systems for land vehicles comprised primarily of land vehicle reciprocating engines and/or electric motors for land vehicles, fluid inlets, fluid compressors, fluid chemical reactors, fluid expanders, fluid transporters, fluid directors, fluid nozzles, propellers, shafts, clutches, fans, bearings, heat exchangers, lubrications systems, seals, valves, control systems, instrumentation, flanges, fasteners, wiring, electrical AC components, and electrical DC components | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by INDIGO POWER SYSTEMS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by INDIGO POWER SYSTEMS, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named INDIGO
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 24, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 5, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 5, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2016 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 11, 2016 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 18, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2015 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 16, 2015 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 24, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2014 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 19, 2014 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 26, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2014 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 25, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 4, 2014 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 14, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2014 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 12, 2014 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 17, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 23, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 3, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 17, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 1, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 1, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 1, 2013 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2013 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 24, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2013 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2013 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2013 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 13, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 12, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 25, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 27, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 3, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |