Drawing for PAVOPHEN

USPTO serial 85501039

PAVOPHEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCDOWELL, MATTHEW J
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with PAVOPHEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brent E. Routman

BRENT E. ROUTMAN MERCHANT & GOULD P.C.PO BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Pain relief medication, analgesics, and pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of insomnia and for sleeping regulationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 17, 2018MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 17, 2018ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 18, 2017CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 15, 2017CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Aug 31, 2017RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 31, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 21, 2017CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 18, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 11, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 11, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 6, 2017ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Aug 9, 2016CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 9, 2016CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jul 7, 2016RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 4, 2016CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 31, 2015CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 21, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 21, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 18, 2015ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jun 29, 2015CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 27, 2015CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jun 25, 2015RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 23, 2014CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 22, 2014CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 9, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 9, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 2, 2014ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jun 9, 2014CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 6, 2014CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
May 22, 2014RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Nov 18, 2013CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 16, 2013CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 12, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 12, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 4, 2013ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
May 14, 2013CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 14, 2013CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Apr 18, 2013RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Oct 12, 2012CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 11, 2012CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 18, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 18, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 14, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 6, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 28, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 27, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 27, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 3, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 24, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance