Drawing for RYDIS

USPTO serial 85501407

RYDIS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RHIM, ANDREW
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RYDIS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert E. Bushnell

ROBERT E. BUSHNELL ROBERT E. BUSHNELL & LAW FIRM2029 K ST NW STE 600WASHINGTON, DC 20006-1004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Self-propelled, Roaming and Robotic Apparatus for ventilating, water supply and sanitary purposes, namely, Household Air Cleaners, Air Cleaning Units, Air Purifying Apparatus, Air Conditioners, Ventilators, Air sterilizers and Humidifiers, all for cleaning, purifying and filtering ambient air for buildings and for household useACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 24, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 24, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 27, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 25, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 21, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 22, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 22, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 22, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 27, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 27, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 7, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 19, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 19, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 19, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 19, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 19, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 19, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 19, 2012ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Oct 19, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 17, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 17, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 4, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 27, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 27, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 27, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 27, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 27, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 5, 2012MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Jan 4, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 24, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance