USPTO serial 85502143
DUNYA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DUNYA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Scarborough, Ontario, CA
Scarborough, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frank Farfan
FRANK FARFAN DENNISON ASSOCIATES301-133 RICHMOND ST. W.TORONTO, ONTARIO,, M5H2L7CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Preserved and dried beans; processed nuts and seeds; tahini; fruit pulp; olive oil; lemon juice for cooking purposes; pickles; dried fruit; canned fruit and vegetables; edible oils, canned cooked meat, canned fish; canned beans; snack foods, namely, sev, chevdo, nasto, namely, snacks consisting primarily of chick pea flour, spices, raisins and oil; red stuffed chilis | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | rice; spices; cooking sauces; processed crushed garlic for use as seasoning; crushed ginger; tea; flours, noodles, chutney; condiments, namely, garlic pastes, ginger pastes, ginger and garlic pastes | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | unprocessed nuts and seeds | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Fruit juices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Shah Trading Company Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Shah Trading Company Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named DUNYA
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 19, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 17, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2016 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2016 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 1, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2015 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 28, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 13, 2015 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 21, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2015 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 3, 2015 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 26, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2014 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 20, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 31, 2014 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 15, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2014 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 13, 2014 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 13, 2013 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 18, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 29, 2013 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 16, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 13, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 13, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 13, 2013 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 4, 2013 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Apr 19, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 19, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 28, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 27, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 1, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 2, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 4, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |