USPTO serial 85502207
BARLEY POWER GREEN SUPREME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOINER, KATINA JACKSON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BARLEY POWER GREEN SUPREME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New Wilmington, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John P. Corcoran, Jr.
JOHN P CORCORAN JR JONES GREGG CREEHAN AND GERACE LLP411 7TH AVE STE 1200PITTSBURGH, PA 15219-1921UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Dietary supplements also containing organically grown barley plants | ACTIVE | Aug 31, 1987 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2014 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 1, 2014 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 1, 2014 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 18, 2014 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Dec 17, 2013 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Nov 18, 2013 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2013 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2013 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 10, 2013 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2013 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2013 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 24, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2013 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 17, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 17, 2013 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 20, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 20, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 25, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 2, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 4, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 2012 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 26, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |