Drawing for OMNI ENVIRO WATER SYSTEMS

USPTO serial 85502611

OMNI ENVIRO WATER SYSTEMS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MULLEN, MARK
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with OMNI ENVIRO WATER SYSTEMS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John C. Baum

EMILY POOLE OWEN WICKERSHAM & ERICKSON PC455 MARKET STSTE 1910SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-5408

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011WATER TREATMENT APPARATUS, NAMELY, A DEVICE FOR PASSING FLUID THROUGH A MAGNETIC FIELD; WATER TREATMENT APPARATUS FOR WATER PURIFICATION AND FILTRATION; AND WATER SOFTENING UNITSABANDONED—
040WASTE WATER TREATMENT SERVICES; WATER TREATMENT SERVICESABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 23, 2016MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Nov 23, 2016ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Nov 23, 2016OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Nov 23, 2016OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Sep 19, 2012OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jun 18, 2012ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 22, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 22, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 2, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 16, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 16, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 13, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 12, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 12, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 9, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 9, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 9, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 2, 2012AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Feb 9, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 31, 2012PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Jan 5, 2012MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Jan 4, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 26, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance