Drawing for QUICKSILVER

USPTO serial 85503371

QUICKSILVER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MARTIN, EUGENIA K
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with QUICKSILVER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bret E. Field

BRET E. FIELD BOZICEVIC, FIELD & FRANCIS LLP1900 UNIVERSITY AVE STE 200EAST PALO ALTO, CA 94303-2297UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware for storage of data; Computer storage devices for storage and backup of electronic data either locally or via a telecommunications network namely, computer hardware and associated operating systems sold as a unit; Computer storage devices for storage and backup of electronic data through cloud computing, namely, computer hardware and associated operating systems sold as a unit; Computer software for storing and archiving of electronic dataACTIVE—
039Cloud computing services, namely, electronic data storageACTIVE—
042Providing virtual computer systems and virtual computer environments through cloud computing; Cloud computing featuring software for use in data storage and backup; Cloud computing services, namely, back-up services for computer hard drive dataACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 15, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 15, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 11, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 16, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 16, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 26, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 11, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 2, 2018RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 1, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 22, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 13, 2017RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 10, 2017RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 7, 2016RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 30, 2015RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 25, 2015RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 12, 2014RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 22, 2014RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 21, 2013RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 15, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 15, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 15, 2013GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 15, 2013GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 15, 2013CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 11, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 10, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 10, 2013ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Oct 12, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 12, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 12, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 13, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 12, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 12, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 31, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 5, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 27, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance