Drawing for MONDIAL

USPTO serial 85503420

MONDIAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MEIER, SHARON A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MONDIAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Salvatore A. Sidoti

Salvatore A. Sidoti Curatolo Sidoti Co., LPA24500 Center Ridge RoadSuite 280Cleveland, OH 44145

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Flat iron for hair; electric irons; scales; electric devices for curling hair, namely, curling irons; DVD playersACTIVE—
011Hair dryers; electric fans for personal use; electric toaster machines; electric coffee makers; machines for roasting coffee; electric pans; bread baking machines; electric grill for food; electric space heaters; microwavesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 8, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 7, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 14, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 13, 2015EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Mar 12, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 27, 2015EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jan 27, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 27, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 27, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 5, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 1, 2014EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 1, 2014EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 1, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 7, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 5, 2014EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 5, 2014EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 5, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 27, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 25, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 25, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 25, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 2, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 31, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 31, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 31, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 7, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 12, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 12, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 23, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 7, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 3, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 17, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 7, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 6, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 6, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 30, 2012GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Mar 30, 2012GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Mar 30, 2012EPENCOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY—
Mar 30, 2012CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Mar 28, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 5, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 27, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance