USPTO serial 85503742
ARZO ENTERPRISES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 24, 2013
- Examiner
- CLAYTON, CHERYL A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 124
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ARZO ENTERPRISES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
WASHINGTON, DC, US
WASHINGTON, DC, US
XXXX, US
XXXX, US
XXXX, US
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Assistance and consultancy services in the field of business management of companies in the energy sector; Business consulting service that provides transformational strategies to companies wishing to move towards sustainability and socially responsible business practices, provided mainly to the consumer products industry; Business information services, namely, gathering and reporting information regarding e-mail addresses of others that are made available to other companies for commercial purposes; Business management and advisory services to companies in fragmented industries desiring to consolidate/roll up using a partnership structure; Business management assistance to industrial or commercial companies; Business management consulting with relation to strategy, financing, marketing, production, personnel and sale matters for companies involved with thin film and nano technologies and plasma processes; Business management for a trade company and for a service company; Business management services, namely, purchasing of and selling of companies for others; Company management, including consultancy in demographic matters; Consultancy regarding the organization or managing of a trade company; Consultation services in the field of company, business sector and industry data and research; Economic consulting and information for the industrial and commercial sectors for planning, organizing, monitoring and carrying out unique and complex projects in different sectors of one or several companies; Lobbying services, namely, promoting the interests of international, real estate and nonprofit companies in the fields of politics, legislation, and regulation; Online business research services that allow users to share opinions with a marketing research company related to everyday consumer products and services; Providing a website at which entrepreneurs post company profiles to attract venture capital; Providing an interactive web site for persons to register complaints against companies and/or services of all types; Providing incentive award programs for customers through issuance and processing of loyalty points for on-line purchase of company's goods and services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ARZO ENT.
- Other trademarks owned by ARZO ENT.
- Other trademarks owned by XXXX
- Other trademarks owned by XXXX
- Other trademarks owned by XXXX
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named ARZO ENTERPRISES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2026 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 22, 2020 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 17, 2020 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Jan 6, 2020 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2020 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Nov 23, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 31, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2019 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2019 | ERTI | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION INQUIRY LETTER | — |
| Oct 2, 2019 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Oct 2, 2019 | HSCD | HIDDEN SENSITIVE CONTENT | — |
| Oct 2, 2019 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 20, 2019 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 2, 2019 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - INFORMATION MADE OF RECORD | — |
| Jan 4, 2019 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2019 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 24, 2018 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 5, 2017 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2017 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 24, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 8, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 18, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 3, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 2, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2013 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2013 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 26, 2013 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jul 12, 2013 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2013 | RGIA | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED | — |
| Jul 8, 2013 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 3, 2013 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2013 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2013 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Feb 25, 2013 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Feb 5, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 4, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2012 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2012 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2012 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 8, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 17, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 24, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 23, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 18, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 17, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 9, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 29, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |