Drawing for SYSTEMIZER

USPTO serial 85505697

SYSTEMIZER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
โ€”
Examiner
BUTTON, JENNIFER JO
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SYSTEMIZER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michele S. Katz

Michele S. Katz ADVITAM IP, LLC160 N Wacker DriveCHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009hand-operated and mechanically operated physical and chemical apparatus for the manufacture and maintenance of accumulators, batteries and chargers therefor, namely, electric, pressure and gas sensors; hand-operated and mechanically operated electrotechnical apparatus for the measuring, monitoring, checking, regulating, maintenance, recovery and recycling of accumulators, batteries and chargers therefor, namely, electric, pressure and gas sensorsACTIVEโ€”

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 13, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 13, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 3, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILEDโ€”
Sep 2, 2014EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTEDโ€”
Aug 31, 2014EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILEDโ€”
Aug 31, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 25, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILEDโ€”
Feb 22, 2014EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTEDโ€”
Feb 12, 2014EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILEDโ€”
Feb 12, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 13, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILEDโ€”
Sep 12, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTEDโ€”
Sep 4, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILEDโ€”
Sep 4, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 20, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILEDโ€”
Mar 20, 2013NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILEDโ€”
Mar 19, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTEDโ€”
Mar 19, 2013DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETEโ€”
Mar 10, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGALโ€”
Mar 8, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILEDโ€”
Mar 8, 2013DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVEDโ€”
Mar 8, 2013ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVEDโ€”
Mar 8, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 11, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline โ€” usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 17, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILEDโ€”
Jul 17, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 27, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILEDโ€”
Jun 14, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETEDโ€”
Jun 12, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIEโ€”
May 23, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTERโ€”
May 23, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTEREDโ€”
May 23, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILEDโ€”
May 23, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILEDโ€”
May 23, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTENโ€”
May 21, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVEDโ€”
Apr 10, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 10, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 10, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINERโ€”
Jan 6, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTEREDโ€”
Jan 2, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTEREDโ€”

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance