Drawing for HAPPYIQ

USPTO serial 85508327

HAPPYIQ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCCAULEY, BRENDAN D
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HAPPYIQ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ann K. Ford

Ann K. Ford DLA Piper LLP (US)500 Eighth Street, NWWashington, DC 20004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009DVDs featuring content related to brain development in babies and toddlers; computer application software for smart phones, namely, software featuring content related to brain development in babies and toddlers; educational games for infants and toddlers, namely, video game software and interactive game programsACTIVE—
016Flash cardsACTIVE—
028Educational games for infants and toddlers, namely, board games and educational card gamesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 4, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 4, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 11, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 10, 2015EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
May 26, 2015EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
May 26, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 8, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 8, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 13, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 12, 2014EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 10, 2014EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 10, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 24, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 23, 2014EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 19, 2014EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 19, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 22, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 21, 2014EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 31, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 31, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 12, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 12, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 14, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 10, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 10, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 10, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 3, 2013CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
May 3, 2013COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Dec 4, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 9, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 9, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 19, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 6, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 24, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 15, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 14, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 13, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 13, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 10, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 10, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 10, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 9, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 10, 2012MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jan 9, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 7, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance