USPTO serial 85508883
PENNY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HERMAN, RUSS
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PENNY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Laguna Niguel, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian P. Kinder
BRIAN P. KINDER THE KINDER LAW GROUP19200 VON KARMAN AVE FL 4IRVINE, CA 92612-8553UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | sporting goods, namely, skateboards | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2014 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Sep 1, 2014 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2014 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 15, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 2, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 30, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 28, 2013 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 28, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 14, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 12, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 9, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 10, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |