USPTO serial 85509517
THE BREAKFAST PROJECT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4330273Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 7, 2013
- Examiner
- LEASER, ANDREW C
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THE BREAKFAST PROJECT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
National Fluid Milk Processor Promotion Board
Washington, DC
Other trademarks owned by National Fluid Milk Processor Promotion Board
National Fluid Milk Processor Promotion Board
Washington, DC
Other trademarks owned by National Fluid Milk Processor Promotion Board
National Fluid Milk Processor Promotion Board
Washington, DC
Other trademarks owned by National Fluid Milk Processor Promotion Board
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marc E. Miller
MARC E. MILLER Watkinson Miller1100 New Jersey Ave. SE, Suite 910WASHINGTON, DC 20003UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Association services, namely, promoting public awareness of the benefits of good nutrition through advertising; promoting public awareness of the benefits of fluid milk and fluid milk products through advertising via the Internet and all public communications means; promoting the interests of fluid milk processors | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 29, 2012 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by National Fluid Milk Processor Promotion Board
- Other trademarks owned by National Fluid Milk Processor Promotion Board
- Other trademarks owned by National Fluid Milk Processor Promotion Board
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named THE BREAKFAST PROJECT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2019 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 7, 2018 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 19, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 30, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2013 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 16, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 16, 2013 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 15, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 15, 2013 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 15, 2013 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2013 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 15, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 5, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 30, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 30, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 30, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 1, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 29, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 29, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 29, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 11, 2012 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 9, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |