USPTO serial 85511299
MANIMAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AGOSTO, GISELLE MARIE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MANIMAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Las Vegas, NV
Clackamas, OR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dana B. Robinson
JAMES D WEINBERGER FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU PC4 TIMES SQUARE17TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10036Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Men's, Women's and Children's clothing, namely, Tops, bottoms, pants, underwear, socks, T-shirts, hats, sweatpants, sweatshirts, long sleeve shirts, thermal tops, shorts, bathing suits, athletic uniforms, tank tops, wrist wraps, footwear, jackets, warm-up suits, belts, beanies, bandanas, wrist bands, sweaters, jeans, Compression garments for athletic or other non-medical use, namely, compression socks, stockings, leggings, jerseys, vests, trousers, sleeves, shirts | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 2022 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 5, 2022 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 5, 2022 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 7, 2022 | CTDD | CT DECISION: DISMISSED | — |
| Feb 13, 2020 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 16, 2018 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2018 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2017 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 7, 2017 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 21, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 30, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 28, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 23, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 4, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 2, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 2, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 20, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 7, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 6, 2013 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| May 7, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 6, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 17, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 12, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 12, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 15, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 14, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 18, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 13, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 12, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 11, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |