Drawing for Serial No. 85512196

USPTO serial 85512196

Serial No. 85512196

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FRENCH, CURTIS W
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 85512196?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brian Beverly

BRIAN BEVERLY BEESON SKINNER BEVERLY, LLP1 KAISER PLZ STE 750OAKLAND, CA 94612-3611UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for health care providers for the purposes of capturing, storing, managing and sharing patient medical informationACTIVE—
044Providing an online database of patient medical information that may be accessed by authorized patients and medical providers; providing a website of patient medical information that may be accessed by authorized patients and medical providersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 23, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 23, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 5, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 4, 2015EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Apr 23, 2015EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 23, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 28, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 27, 2014EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 22, 2014EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 22, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 30, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 29, 2014EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 22, 2014EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 22, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 30, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 29, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 25, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 25, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 25, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 28, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 26, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 26, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 26, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 23, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 28, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 28, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 8, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 23, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 23, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 2, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 8, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 8, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 8, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 8, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 6, 2012GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 6, 2012GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 6, 2012CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
May 17, 2012ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 14, 2012PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Apr 17, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 13, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 13, 2012MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Jan 12, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 12, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance