Drawing for GREEN MACHINE

USPTO serial 85513366

GREEN MACHINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SINGH, TEJBIR
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GREEN MACHINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Billie Jean Smith

Billie Jean Smith MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDRICH LLP100 E WISCONSIN AVE STE 3300MILWAUKEE, WI 53202-4108UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Power-operated weed and brush trimmers; rechargeable hedge cuttersABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 12, 2013MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Aug 12, 2013ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Aug 9, 2013EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jul 31, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 4, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 1, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 30, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 30, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 30, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 31, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 5, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 5, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 16, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 2, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 1, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 11, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 10, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 9, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 9, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 4, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 4, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 4, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 4, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 13, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 13, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance