Drawing for SMARTSYNC

USPTO serial 85513944

SMARTSYNC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEE, DOUGLAS
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SMARTSYNC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Patricia I. Reding

PATRICIA I. REDING FAEGRE BAKER DANIELS LLP90 S 7TH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-3903UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Window shadesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 26, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 26, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 24, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 29, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 29, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 9, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 24, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 24, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 17, 2014XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 17, 2014GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 17, 2014GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 17, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 19, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 19, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 19, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 14, 2013RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 12, 2013RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 8, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 8, 2012GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 8, 2012GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 8, 2012CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 7, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 7, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 7, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 13, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 13, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 13, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 9, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 18, 2012MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jan 17, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 14, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance