USPTO serial 85515249
DRINK DIFFERENTLY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WIENER, MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DRINK DIFFERENTLY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Elixirs, namely, herbal infused vegetable and fruit beverages, herbal teas, cold teas and caffeinated teas | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Non-alcoholic beverages, namely, vegetable and fruit juices, smoothies; non-alcoholic beverages, namely, filtered water; coconut water based juices and smoothies | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2015 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jan 20, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 19, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 16, 2014 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 6, 2014 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Jun 6, 2014 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2014 | EWOR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL AS DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 14, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 13, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 8, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 5, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 19, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 20, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 31, 2012 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 16, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |