USPTO serial 85515526
S.O.B.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KOLACZ, KATHLEEN L
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with S.O.B.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard E. Lyon, Jr.
RICHARD E LYON JR HOLLAND & KNIGHT400 SOUTH HOPE STREET 8TH FLOORLOS ANGELES, CA 90071UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 034 | CIGARS, CIGARETTES, HUMIDORS, CIGAR AND CIGARETTE LIGHTERS NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL, ASHTRAYS NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL; CIGAR AND CIGARETTE LIGHTERS AND ASHTRAYS OF PRECIOUS METAL; NONE OF THE FOREGOING CIGAR AND CIGARETTE LIGHTERS ARE FOR AUTOMOBILES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 9, 2013 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 8, 2013 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 8, 2013 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 8, 2013 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 15, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 15, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2013 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 8, 2013 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 20, 2013 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 6, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 1, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 31, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 30, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 30, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 12, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 5, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 5, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 28, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 16, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |