USPTO serial 85515717
APPS ASSOCIATES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLANE, SUZANNE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with APPS ASSOCIATES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Glenn Wegrzyn, Esq.
GLENN WEGRZYN, ESQ. RAMINENI LAW ASSOCIATES, LLC800 W CUMMINGS PARK STE 5400WOBURN, MA 01801-6385UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Computer education training services; Training in the use and operation of computer software; Training in the use of computer software; Training services in the field of information technology | ACTIVE | Sep 27, 2002 |
| 042 | Computer consultation; Computer hardware and software design; Computer programming and computer system analysis; Computer programming consultancy; Computer programming services for commercial analysis and reporting; Computer programming services for others in the field of software configuration management; Computer services, namely, acting as an application service provider in the field of information management to host computer application software for the purpose of performance management; Computer services, namely, cloud hosting provider services; Computer services, namely, integration of private and public cloud computing environments; Computer services, namely, on-site management of information technology (IT) systems; Computer services, namely, remote management of the information technology (IT) systems of others; Computer services, namely, remote management of information technology for others; Computer software consultancy; Computer software consulting; Computer software design; Computer software design and updating; Computer software design for others; Computer software development; Computer systems integration services; Computer technical support services, namely, 24/7 service desk/help desk services for IT infrastructure, operating systems, database systems, and web applications.; Computer technology support services, namely, help desk services; Consulting in the field of configuration management for computer hardware and software; Consulting in the field of information technology; Consulting in the field of telecommunications technology; Consulting services in the field of cloud computing; Consulting services in the field of computer-based information systems for businesses; Consulting services in the field of designing engines to be more efficient; Consulting services in the field of hosting computer software applications; Consulting services in the fields of selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; Design and development of computer software; Design and development of computer software for information technology; Design, development and implementation of software; Design, development, and consulting services related thereto in the field of computer software; Design, development, and implementation of software for information technology; Design, maintenance, development and updating of computer software; Developing computer software; Developing customized software for others; Information technology consultation; IT consulting services; IT integration services; Technical consulting services in the fields of datacenter architecture, public and private cloud computing solutions, and evaluation and implementation of internet technology and services; Technical support services, namely, remote and on-site infrastructure management services for monitoring, administration and management of public and private cloud computing IT and application systems; Technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer software problems | ACTIVE | Sep 27, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 17, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 4, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2012 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 23, 2012 | PBPO | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - PETITIONS OFFICE REQUEST | — |
| Aug 11, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 10, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 30, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 26, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 28, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 29, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 20, 2012 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |