Drawing for KEYARA

USPTO serial 85516518

KEYARA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHOSID, ROBIN S
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KEYARA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David Ehrlich

DAVID EHRLICH FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, P.C.866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017-1822UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment and prevention of cancerABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 11, 2013MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Jul 11, 2013ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Jul 2, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 12, 2013NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 10, 2013EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
May 30, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 30, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 30, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 29, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 29, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 31, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 26, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 2, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 2, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 26, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 17, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 19, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 18, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 15, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 19, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 17, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance