USPTO serial 85520124
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Toronto, Ontario, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan Neuberger Weller
SUSAN NEUBERGER WELLER MINTZ, LEVIN, COHN, FERRIS, GLOVSKY AND POPEO, P.C701 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NW STE 900WASHINGTON, DC 20004-2608UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software to provide information relating to travel and tourist attractions, cultural and historic sites, sports and entertainment venues and events; downloadable software for use with interpretive guides to provide information relating to travel and tourist attractions, cultural and historic sites, sports and entertainment venues and events; GPS (global positioning system) used to determine location and mapping information relating to travel and tourist attractions, cultural and historic sites, sports and entertainment venues and events | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Information services in the field of travel and tour guidance and locations | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Information services in the field of cultural and historic sites, sports and entertainment venues and events | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | The provision of downloadable software featuring information and travel and tour guidance relating to cultural and historic sites, sports and entertainment venues and events, tour and travel locations and information | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 6, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 6, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 8, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 8, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 27, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 27, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 23, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 15, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 14, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 21, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 12, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 11, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 4, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 27, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 26, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 26, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 2012 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 24, 2012 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 23, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |