USPTO serial 85520298
MAXWELL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 16, 2016
- Examiner
- LOOK, JEFFREY J
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with MAXWELL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $797*
Plus Government fees of $2,550
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Vancouver, Brit. Col., CA
Vancouver, Brit. Col., CA
VANCOUVER, BC, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
COREY A. DONALDSON
COREY A. DONALDSON FERGUSON CASE ORR PATERSON LLP1050 SOUTH KIMBALL ROADVENTURA, CA 93004United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | [Bedding, namely, pillows; fitted cushion covers; drapery and curtain hardware, namely, brackets, rings, poles, finials, rods, hooks; fitted fabric furniture covers; window shades and window blinds; tie backs not made of textile; chair ties not made of textile; cushions] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 024 | [Bath linens; bath towels; bed linens; bedding, namely, sheets, blankets, quilts, throws, duvet covers, bedspreads, pillow shams, pillow cases, bed skirts and dust ruffles; unfitted fabric cushion covers; unfitted fabric furniture covers; shower curtains; fabric tablecloths; table linens; throws; quilts; textile wall hangings; fabric window coverings and treatments, namely, curtains, draperies, sheers, swags, valances;] upholstery fabrics; curtain fabrics; drapery fabrics; fabric for use in the manufacture of lampshades, window coverings and window treatments, bed linens, bedding, namely, sheets, blankets, quilts, throws, duvet covers, bedspreads, pillow shams, pillow cases, bed skirts and dust ruffles, pillows, cushions, fabric cushion covers, fabric furniture covers, [bath linens, bath towels, umbrellas,] furniture, shower curtains, tablecloths, table linens, throws, quilts, textile wall hangings, [bath mats, bath rugs, area mats] and area rugs [; tie backs made of textile; chair ties made of textile] | ACTIVE | — |
| 026 | [Trimmings for home furnishings, namely, rouche, decorative lip cord, fringe, bullion, lace, braid and decorative tape; tassels for home furnishings] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 027 | [Bath mats, bath rugs, carpeting, area rugs,] textile wall coverings and fabrics used as wall coverings | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Online retail store services and online wholesale store services featuring fabrics, [home furnishings excluding furniture, bed linens, bedding, window coverings and treatments, cushions, cushion covers, furniture covers, bath linens, bath towels, shower curtains, tablecloths, table linens, throws, quilts, textile wall hangings, trimmings and tassels for home furnishings, bath mats, bath rugs, carpeting, area mats, area rugs,] wallpaper, wall coverings | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Maxwell Fabrics Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Maxwell Fabrics Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Maxwell Fabrics Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 026
- Other trademarks in Class 027
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named MAXWELL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 2026 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2026 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Aug 7, 2026 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Aug 7, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 10, 2026 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2023 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2023 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 4, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 19, 2022 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2021 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 29, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 31, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 11, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 15, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 31, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 7, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 23, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 17, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 5, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 28, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 30, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 30, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 26, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 24, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 24, 2013 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2013 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 7, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 21, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 15, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 29, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 1, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 23, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |