Drawing for REP-PASS

USPTO serial 85520336

REP-PASS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FINNEGAN, TIMOTHY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with REP-PASS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey M. Becker

JEFFREY M. BECKER HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP2323 VICTORY AVE STE 700DALLAS, TX 75219-7673UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software providing credentialing information regarding physicians, pharmaceutical and medical device representatives, and health care providers; Database management software provided to health care providers in the health care industry for health information and physician and pharmaceutical and medical device representatives credentialing management and trackingACTIVE—
035Business consulting services to health care professional providers, physicians, pharmaceutical and medical device representatives, and hospitals in the field of healthcare credentialing and business consulting services in the field of healthcare credentialingACTIVE—
045Verifying and monitoring the credentials and licenses of physicians, pharmaceutical and medical device representatives, and other medical professionals through an automated electronic credentialing system; credentialing physicians, pharmaceutical and medical device representatives, and other medical professionals for hospitals and other third partiesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 22, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 22, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 18, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 24, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 24, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 4, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 19, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 19, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 31, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 30, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 29, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 29, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 2, 2012ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Apr 27, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 27, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 27, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 26, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 25, 2012ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jan 25, 2012MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jan 24, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 23, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance