Drawing for SITE ACCELERATOR

USPTO serial 85520456

SITE ACCELERATOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEE, YATSYE ISADORA
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SITE ACCELERATOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Leslie P. Kramer

LESLIE P. KRAMER FAEGRE BAKER DANIELS LLP1700 LINCOLN STDENVER, CO 80203-4500UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Communications services, namely, providing network access points through which information on the global computer information network passes from one global computer information network service provider to another; telecommunications services, namely, data transmission services via a fiber optic network; transmission of data via electronic means; providing multiple user access to content and data available on a global computer information network; electronic streaming, transmission and delivery of audio and video messages and images on the internet or an intranet; providing video, audio and data transmission services; providing caching services to content providers; delivery of video, images, photographs, audio, software and other media over a telecommunications network; electronic transmission, delivery and streaming of digital media content for others via the internet, intranets, wide area networks, metropolitan area networks, local area networks and/or local computer networks; caching and/or delivery of audio and video data and images via the internet, intranets, wide area networks, metropolitan area networks, local area networks and/or local computer networksACTIVEFeb 1, 2011
042Computer services, namely, web site optimization for third parties; computer services, namely, web site optimization in the nature of optimizing delivery of content to geographically distributed cache servers and associated hosting services in the nature of hosting websites for others; computer services, namely, cloud hosting provider servicesACTIVEFeb 1, 2011

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 23, 2013MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 23, 2013ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 6, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 6, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 6, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 1, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 31, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 31, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 1, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 1, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 1, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 26, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 24, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 23, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance